Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGil, Mateusz
dc.contributor.authorWróbel, Krzysztof
dc.contributor.authorMontewka, Jakub
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-17T10:03:02Z
dc.date.available2019-03-17T10:03:02Z
dc.date.copyright2/18/2019 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0892-7219
dc.identifier.otheromae_141_05_051105.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4255883
dc.description.abstractAs system-theoretic methods of safety assessment are developed, certain aspects of them remain under-explored, including the question of prioritizing one control action's adequacy over another. This paper investigates this feature based on the analysis of a process of merchant vessels' collision avoidance. We first elicit experts' views on the structure of the process and importance of particular interactions occurring therein. Thence, we analyze a number of incident reports to examine the percentage of cases in which failure to ensure the particular control action contributed to the loss. By comparing the results, we strive to determine whether any of the approaches might be beneficial in determining safety control actions' priorities.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleToward a Method Evaluating Control Actions in STPA-Based Model of Ship-Ship Collision Avoidance Process
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume141
dc.journal.issue5
dc.journal.titleJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4042387
dc.journal.fristpage51105
dc.journal.lastpage051105-11
dc.treeJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering:;2019:;volume( 141 ):;issue: 005
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record