Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGaffney, Brecca M. M.
dc.contributor.authorChristiansen, Cory L.
dc.contributor.authorMurray, Amanda M.
dc.contributor.authorMyers, Casey A.
dc.contributor.authorLaz, Peter J.
dc.contributor.authorDavidson, Bradley S.
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-17T09:57:40Z
dc.date.available2019-03-17T09:57:40Z
dc.date.copyright10/31/2017 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn2377-2158
dc.identifier.othervvuq_002_03_031003.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4255819
dc.description.abstractJoint kinetic measurement is a fundamental tool used to quantify compensatory movement patterns in participants with transtibial amputation (TTA). Joint kinetics are calculated through inverse dynamics (ID) and depend on segment kinematics, external forces, and both segment and prosthetic inertial parameters (PIPS); yet the individual influence of PIPs on ID is unknown. The objective of this investigation was to assess the importance of parameterizing PIPs when calculating ID using a probabilistic analysis. A series of Monte Carlo simulations were performed to assess the influence of uncertainty in PIPs on ID. Multivariate input distributions were generated from experimentally measured PIPs (foot/shank: mass, center of mass (COM), moment of inertia) of ten prostheses and output distributions were hip and knee joint kinetics. Confidence bounds (2.5–97.5%) and sensitivity of outputs to model input parameters were calculated throughout one gait cycle. Results demonstrated that PIPs had a larger influence on joint kinetics during the swing period than the stance period (e.g., maximum hip flexion/extension moment confidence bound size: stance = 5.6 N·m, swing: 11.4 N·m). Joint kinetics were most sensitive to shank mass during both the stance and swing periods. Accurate measurement of prosthesis shank mass is necessary to calculate joint kinetics with ID in participants with TTA with passive prostheses consisting of total contact carbon fiber sockets and dynamic elastic response feet during walking.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleThe Effects of Prosthesis Inertial Parameters on Inverse Dynamics: A Probabilistic Analysis
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume2
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4038175
dc.journal.fristpage31003
dc.journal.lastpage031003-8
dc.treeJournal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification:;2019:;volume( 002 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record