• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Risk-Based Methodology for Evaluation of Bioinfiltration Design and Performance

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    JSWBAY.0000869.pdf (471.2Kb)
    Date
    2019
    Author
    Conor Lewellyn; Bridget Wadzuk
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Green infrastructure practices are being implemented as a sustainable way to manage stormwater. Many communities are implementing green infrastructure practices on their own and in conjunction with gray infrastructure upgrades as an adaptation tool to mitigate risks and increase resilience in the face of climate change. Using a risk-based approach for design and planning has been common practice in flood control, but is not common in green infrastructure design. A risk-based approach for analyzing the performance of bioinfiltration practices was developed to assist in design and evaluation of performance over time. Bioinfiltration practices are vegetated basins that capture and retain runoff through infiltration and evapotranspiration without the use of an underdrain. Bioinfiltration facilities with varied ponding depths, media depths, and native soil saturated hydraulic conductivity based on regional design guidelines, and a field-calibrated site, were modeled over a 30-year period and compared to a predevelopment condition as the target design performance, which defined the acceptable risk. In this analysis, risk was determined for each bioinfiltration design based on the product of the probability of a rainfall event occurring, the probability of an overflow event occurring, and the average volume of overflow; the terms used to define risk can be modified to reflect local priorities. Cumulative annual risk for bioinfiltration designs was compared to acceptable risk to determine appropriate design. Results indicated that designs with increased ponding depth decreased cumulative risk. Designs with higher native soil hydraulic conductivity had reduced risk when compared to a predevelopment scenario and observed in the field-calibrated bioinfiltration site. The risk-based approach provides a helpful tool for municipal separate storm sewer system communities and combined sewer communities for design and evaluation of bioinfiltration practices.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4254464
    Collections
    • Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse
    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV