Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZhu, Hongsong
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-28T11:07:03Z
dc.date.available2019-02-28T11:07:03Z
dc.date.copyright2/5/2018 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn0094-9930
dc.identifier.otherpvt_140_02_021202.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4252861
dc.description.abstractBased on the unified analytical method of stress analysis for fixed tubesheet (TS) heat exchangers (HEX), floating head and U-tube HEX presented in Part I, numerical comparisons with ASME method are performed in this paper as Part II. Numerical comparison results indicate that predictions given by the unified method agree well with finite element analysis (FEA), while ASME results are not accurate or not correct. Therefore, it is concluded that the unified method deals with thin TS of different types of HEX in equal detail with confidence to predict design stresses.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleA Unified Analytical Method of Stress Analysis for Tubesheet—Part II: Case Study
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume140
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4038655
dc.journal.fristpage21202
dc.journal.lastpage021202-10
dc.treeJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2018:;volume( 140 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record