Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYin, Decao
dc.contributor.authorLie, Halvor
dc.contributor.authorRusso, Massimiliano
dc.contributor.authorGrytøyr, Guttorm
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-28T11:06:23Z
dc.date.available2019-02-28T11:06:23Z
dc.date.copyright9/14/2017 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn0892-7219
dc.identifier.otheromae_140_01_011701.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4252737
dc.description.abstractMarine drilling riser is subject to complicated environmental loads which include top motions due to mobile offshore drilling unit (MODU), wave loads, and current loads. Cyclic dynamic loads will cause severe fatigue accumulation along the drilling riser system, especially at the subsea wellhead (WH). Statoil and BP have carried out a comprehensive model test program on drilling riser in MARINTEK's Towing Tank in February 2015. The objective is to validate and verify software predictions of drilling riser behavior under various environmental conditions by the use of model test data. Six drilling riser configurations were tested, including different components such as upper flex joint (UFJ), tensioner, marine riser, lower marine riser package (LMRP), blow-out preventer (BOP), lower flex joint (LFJ), buoyancy elements, and seabed boundary model. The drilling riser models were tested in different load conditions. Measurements were made of microbending strains and accelerations along the riser in both in-line (IL) and crossflow (CF) directions. Video recordings were made both above and under water. In this paper, the test setup and test program are presented. Comparisons of results between model test and RIFLEX simulation are presented on selected cases. Preliminary results show that the drilling riser model tests are able to capture the typical dynamic responses observed from field measurement, and the comparison between model test and RIFLEX simulation is promising.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleDrilling Riser Model Test for Software Verification
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume140
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4037727
dc.journal.fristpage11701
dc.journal.lastpage011701-15
dc.treeJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering:;2018:;volume( 140 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record