• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Iron–Chromium–Aluminum (FeCrAl) Cladding Oxidation Kinetics and Auxiliary Feedwater Sensitivity Analysis—Short-Term Station Blackout Simulation of Surry Nuclear Power Plant

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    ners_004_04_041002.pdf (2.955Mb)
    Date
    2018
    Author
    Wang, Jun
    Mccabe, Mckinleigh
    Christopher Haskin, Troy
    Wu, Yingwei
    Su, Guanghui
    Corradini, Michael L.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Accident tolerant fuels (ATF) and steam generator (SG) auxiliary feedwater (AFW) extended operation are two important methods to increase the coping time for nuclear power plant safety response. In light of recent efforts to investigate such methods, we investigate both FeCrAl cladding oxidation kinetics and SG AFW sensitivity analyses, for the Surry nuclear power plant Short-Term Station Blackout simulation using the MELCOR YR 1.8.6 systems code. The first part describes the effects of FeCrAl cladding oxidation kinetics. Zircaloy cladding and two different oxidation models of FeCrAl cladding are compared. The initial hydrogen generation time (>0.5 kg) is used as the evaluation criterion for fuel degradation in a severe accident. Results showed that the more recent oxidation correlation by ORNL predicts much less hydrogen generation than Zircaloy cladding. The second part investigates the effects of three different methods of AFW injection into the SG secondary side. We considered three different methods of water injection; i.e., constant water injection into the secondary side (case 1); water injection based on secondary side water level in boiler region (case 2); water injection based on secondary side water level in the downcomer region (case 3). The case of constant water injection is the most straightforward, but it would have the tendency to overfill the SG with excess water. Water injection with downcomer level control is more reasonable but requires DC power to monitor level and to control AFW injection rate.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4252627
    Collections
    • Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV