Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchulenberg, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorLi, Hongbo
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-28T11:05:41Z
dc.date.available2019-02-28T11:05:41Z
dc.date.copyright12/4/2017 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn2332-8983
dc.identifier.otherners_004_01_011005.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4252608
dc.description.abstractWhile supercritical water is a perfect coolant with excellent heat transfer, a temporary decrease of the system pressure to subcritical conditions, either during intended transients or by accident, can easily cause a boiling crisis with significantly higher cladding temperatures of the fuel assemblies. These conditions have been tested in an out-of-pile experiment with a bundle of four heated rods in the supercritical water multipurpose loop (SWAMUP) facility coconstructed by CGNPC and SJTU in China. Some of the transient tests have been simulated at KIT with a one-dimensional (1D) matlab code, assuming quasi-steady-state flow conditions, but time dependent temperatures in the fuel rods. Heat transfer at supercritical and at near-critical conditions was modeled with a recent look-up table of Zahlan (2015, “Derivation of a Look-Up Table for Trans-Critical Heat Transfer in Water Cooled Tubes,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.), and subcritical film boiling was modeled with the look-up table of Groeneveld et al. (2003, “A Look-Up Table for Fully Developed Film Boiling Heat Transfer,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 225(1), pp. 83–97.). Moreover, a conduction controlled rewetting process was included in the analyses, which is based on an analytical solution of Schulenberg and Raqué (2014, “Transient Heat Transfer During Depressurization From Supercritical Pressure,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 79(12), pp. 233–240.). The method could well reproduce the boiling crisis during depressurization from supercritical to subcritical pressure, including rewetting of the hot zone within some minutes, but the peak temperature was somewhat under-predicted. Tests with a lower heat flux, which did not cause such phenomena, could be predicted as well. In another test with increasing pressure, however, a boiling crisis was also observed at a heat flux, which was significantly lower than the critical heat flux (CHF) predicted by the CHF look-up table of Groeneveld et al. (2007, “The 2006 CHF Look-Up Table,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 237(15–17), pp. 1909–1922.). The paper is summarizing the physical models and the numerical approach. Comparison with experimental data is used to discuss the applicability of the method for the design of supercritical water-cooled reactors (SCWR).
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleTransient Heat Transfer in an Out-of-Pile SCWR Fuel Assembly Test at Near-Critical Pressure
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume4
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4038061
dc.journal.fristpage11005
dc.journal.lastpage011005-7
dc.treeJournal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science:;2018:;volume( 004 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record