Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKiss, Attila
dc.contributor.authorChurkin, Andrey
dc.contributor.authorPilkhwal, Darwan S.
dc.contributor.authorVaidya, Abhijeet M.
dc.contributor.authorAmbrosini, Walter
dc.contributor.authorPucciarelli, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorPodila, Krishna
dc.contributor.authorRao, Yanfei
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Laurence
dc.contributor.authorYuzhou, Chen
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Mark
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Meng
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-28T11:05:29Z
dc.date.available2019-02-28T11:05:29Z
dc.date.copyright12/4/2017 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn2332-8983
dc.identifier.otherners_004_01_011001.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4252575
dc.description.abstractTwo computational fluid dynamic (CFD) benchmarks have been performed to assess the prediction accuracy and sensitivity of CFD codes for heat transfer in different geometries. The first benchmark focused on heat transfer to water in a tube (first benchmark), while the second benchmark covered heat transfer to water in two different channel geometries (second benchmark) at supercritical pressures. In the first round with the experimental data unknown to the participants (i.e., blind calculations), CFD calculations were conducted with initial boundary conditions and simpler CFD models. After assessment against measurements, the calculations were repeated with the refined boundary conditions and material properties in the follow-up calculation phase. Overall, the CFD codes seem to be able to capture the general trend of heat transfer in the tube and the annular channel but further improvements are required in order to enhance the prediction accuracy. Finally, sensitivity analyses on the numerical mesh and the boundary conditions were performed. It was found that the prediction accuracy has not been improved with the introduction of finer meshes and the effect of mass flux on the result is the strongest among various investigated boundary conditions.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleSummary on the Results of Two Computational Fluid Dynamic Benchmarks of Tube and Different Channel Geometries
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume4
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4038162
dc.journal.fristpage11001
dc.journal.lastpage011001-15
dc.treeJournal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science:;2018:;volume( 004 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record