Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSwamee Prabhata K.;Rathie Pushpa N.;Chahar Bhagu R.
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-26T07:49:25Z
dc.date.available2019-02-26T07:49:25Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29IR.1943-4774.0001327.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4249645
dc.description.abstractIf the flow in a pipeline is maintained by creating a pressure head by pumping, it is called a pumping main. On the other hand, the flow in a canal is maintained through an elevation difference. Being gravity sustained, open-channel flow is preferred in comparison to pipe flow that is sustained by pumping. Furthermore, in the absence of moving parts, open-channel flow has greater reliability. For a gently sloping topography, the gravitational system involves large canal sections. In comparison to a pumping main such a small sloped canal may be uneconomical. A review of the literature has indicated that there is no guideline available for adoption of a canal for such a flat terrain. In this investigation, the optimal cost function of pumping main has been compared with the cost of various canal section shapes to find a criterion for adoption of canal flow.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleEconomic Viability of Canal Flow
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume144
dc.journal.issue8
dc.journal.titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001327
dc.page6018003
dc.treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 144 ):;issue: 008
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record