| dc.contributor.author | Swamee Prabhata K.;Rathie Pushpa N.;Chahar Bhagu R. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-02-26T07:49:25Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-02-26T07:49:25Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.identifier.other | %28ASCE%29IR.1943-4774.0001327.pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4249645 | |
| dc.description.abstract | If the flow in a pipeline is maintained by creating a pressure head by pumping, it is called a pumping main. On the other hand, the flow in a canal is maintained through an elevation difference. Being gravity sustained, open-channel flow is preferred in comparison to pipe flow that is sustained by pumping. Furthermore, in the absence of moving parts, open-channel flow has greater reliability. For a gently sloping topography, the gravitational system involves large canal sections. In comparison to a pumping main such a small sloped canal may be uneconomical. A review of the literature has indicated that there is no guideline available for adoption of a canal for such a flat terrain. In this investigation, the optimal cost function of pumping main has been compared with the cost of various canal section shapes to find a criterion for adoption of canal flow. | |
| dc.publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| dc.title | Economic Viability of Canal Flow | |
| dc.type | Journal Paper | |
| dc.journal.volume | 144 | |
| dc.journal.issue | 8 | |
| dc.journal.title | Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001327 | |
| dc.page | 6018003 | |
| dc.tree | Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 144 ):;issue: 008 | |
| dc.contenttype | Fulltext | |