Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLove Peter E. D.;Ahiaga-Dagbui Dominic D.;Smith Simon D.;Sing Michael C.-P;Tokede Olubukola
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-26T07:45:36Z
dc.date.available2019-02-26T07:45:36Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29IS.1943-555X.0000441.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4249155
dc.description.abstractThe expected final budgeted costs of infrastructure assets are often exceeded during project delivery. Being able to determine the likelihood of changes to the final budget can enable clients to implement strategies to manage and control costs during construction. To understand the changing nature of costs, this paper examines the cost profiles of 1,93 water infrastructure projects that were delivered by a water utility company. Cost overruns were experienced in 656 projects. Only 1 project was delivered on budget; the remaining 436 were completed under final budget approval. A mean cost overrun and underrun of +19.97 and −32%, are found, respectively. The best-fit distribution for cost overruns and underruns for determining their probability of occurrence is calculated. The research moves beyond examining the cost performance of heterogeneous data sets that have dominated previous studies to the use of a homogeneous sample, which enables more-reliable contingency forecasts to be determined.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleCost Profiling of Water Infrastructure Projects
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume24
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Infrastructure Systems
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000441
dc.page4018023
dc.treeJournal of Infrastructure Systems:;2018:;Volume ( 024 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record