Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorContreras Carlos;Angulo Julio
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-26T07:45:31Z
dc.date.available2019-02-26T07:45:31Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29IS.1943-555X.0000425.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4249139
dc.description.abstractA widespread practice used in concession-based public private–partnerships (PPPs) arrangements consists of granting the concessionaire the right, under certain circumstances, to extend the concession term under a build-operate-finance-transfer (BOFT) arrangement. The asset involved in the project becomes the property of the government on its transfer. Thus, extending the concession period means an opportunity cost for the host government. By using an option-pricing model, this paper proposes a methodology for valuing the impact on the public budget arising from this option. This method can be of use in different transportation infrastructure projects, such as motorways, tunnels, and bridges. A case study is provided to show how the proposed methodology can be applied. The results confirm that the opportunity cost for the government may be high, and the main drivers behind this cost are the extension period, the base interest rates, and the risk premium of the government.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleGovernment Cost of Extending Concession Term Rights
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume24
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Infrastructure Systems
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000425
dc.page4018011
dc.treeJournal of Infrastructure Systems:;2018:;Volume ( 024 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record