• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Deep Learning–Based Fully Automated Pavement Crack Detection on 3D Asphalt Surfaces with an Improved CrackNet

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    %28ASCE%29CP.1943-5487.0000775.pdf (2.523Mb)
    Date
    2018
    Author
    Zhang Allen;Wang Kelvin C. P.;Fei Yue;Liu Yang;Tao Siyu;Chen Cheng;Li Joshua Q.;Li Baoxian
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    CrackNet is the result of an 18-month collaboration within a 1-person team to develop a deep learning–based pavement crack detection software that demonstrated successes in terms of consistency for both precision and bias. This paper proposes an improved architecture of CrackNet called CrackNet II for enhanced learning capability and faster performance. The proposed CrackNet II represents two major modifications on the original CrackNet. First, the feature generator, which provides handcrafted features through fixed and nonlearnable procedures, is no longer used in CrackNet II. Consequently, all layers in CrackNet II have learnable parameters that are tuned during the learning process. Second, CrackNet II has a deeper architecture with more hidden layers but fewer parameters. Such an architecture yields five times faster performance compared with the original CrackNet. Similar to the original CrackNet, CrackNet II still uses invariant image width and height through all layers to place explicit requirements on pixel-perfect accuracy. In addition, the combination of a convolution layer and a 1×1 convolution layer was repeated in CrackNet II to learn local motifs with different sizes of local receptive fields. CrackNet II was trained with 2,5 diverse example images and then demonstrated to outperform the original CrackNet. The experiment using 2 testing images showed that CrackNet II performs generally better than the original CrackNet in terms of both precision and recall. The overall precision, recall, and F-measure achieved by CrackNet II for the 2 testing images were 9.2, 89.6, and 89.62%, respectively. Compared with the original CrackNet, CrackNet II is capable of detecting more fine or hairline cracks, while eliminating more local noises and maintaining much faster processing speed.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4248636
    Collections
    • Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV