• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Energy Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Energy Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Theoretical Comparative Study of Quantum Dot Solar Cell Behavior for Single and Multi-Intermediate Bands

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    %28ASCE%29EY.1943-7897.0000346.pdf (4.130Mb)
    Date
    2016
    Author
    Abou El-Maaty M. Aly
    A. Nasr
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    In this paper, the mathematical model of the intermediate band quantum dot solar cell (IBQDSC) is investigated by using one and two intermediate bands (IBs). The IBs arise from the quantum dot (QD) semiconductor material within the barrier bandgap energy. Some factors, such as the thickness of the quantum dot (TQD) and the thickness of the barrier or inter-dot distances between quantum dots (TB), are studied to show their influence on the performance of the IBQDSC. In the proposed model, the cubic shape of QDs from InAs0.9N0.1 and the barrier or bulk semiconductor material from GaAs0.98Sb0.02 are utilized. The time-independent Schrödinger equation is solved by employing the Kronig-Penney model. From the obtained results, after a homogenous range of the TQD and TB is assigned for each one IB (1IB) and two IBs (2IBs) quantum dot solar cells (QDSCs), various comparative studies between the induced efficiency and the parameters of 1IB and 2IB QDSCs are investigated for one and maximum sun concentrations (MSCs). Consequently, reassigned ranges of the TQD and the TB, according to the type of IBs and sun concentration, are determined. The TQD is an essential parameter for determining the number, location, and thickness of IBs into the QDSC. The small variation of TB is noticeable for each type of IBQDSC at different sun concentrations. Consequently, the induced values of the 1IB energy width (Δ) and the 2IBs energy widths (Δ1 and Δ2) are determined. The value of Δ is held constant, whereas the values of Δ1 and Δ2 are changed according to the solar cell (SC). However, the difference in the value of Δ2 is large and noticeable. The TQD and TB values, which achieve the optimum efficiency, are varied from 2.1 and 2.5 nm to 2.4 and 2.3 nm for the 1IB QDSC at one sun to MSC, respectively. The TQD and TB values are also varied from 5.3 and 3 nm to 5.25 and 2.09 nm for the 2IBs QDSC at one sun to MSC, respectively. One can notice that, in the case of 2IBs, an improvement into the efficiency is achieved. The optimum efficiencies of the 1IB QDSC and 2IBs QDSC for the model under study are 42.39 and 58.01% at one sun and 66.21 and 73.55% at MSC, respectively.
    URI
    http://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4245772
    Collections
    • Journal of Energy Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV