• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Energy Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Energy Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Equilibrium Modeling of Combined Heat and Power Deployment

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    %28ASCE%29EY.1943-7897.0000306.pdf (2.389Mb)
    Date
    2016
    Author
    Anand Govindarajan
    Seth Blumsack
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Combined heat and power (CHP) generates electricity and heat from the same fuel source and can provide these services at higher equivalent conversion efficiency relative to grid-purchased electricity and stand-alone steam production. Previous work has focused on the economic factors and optimal operation strategy that influence the decision to install a single CHP unit. The approach discussed in this paper is to assess the economic potential for CHP in an electricity-market equilibrium framework, accounting for the impact that CHP adoption at scale will have on electricity prices—incremental installations of CHP reduce the demand for grid-provided electricity in some locations, thus reducing wholesale prices in that location. A statistical model of electricity supply and pricing is utilized to estimate locational electricity supply curves that reflect the impact of transmission congestion on locational price formation and location-specific elasticities of supply. The zonal electricity pricing model is coupled with the model of CHP adoption and utilization in commercial buildings for two locations in the PJM power grid. Under a range of operational assumptions and fuel prices, returns to incremental CHP deployment decrease rapidly in both locations for the first 100 MW of building-integrated CHP deployed, although CHP becomes an uneconomical decision only at much higher deployment levels. Although the elasticity of supply is an important determinant of economic potential for CHP, the authors find that in most cases, operating CHP units to follow building thermal demand (versus electrical demand, which would offset peak electricity-demand periods) yields higher returns over a broader range of CHP deployment levels.
    URI
    http://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4245739
    Collections
    • Journal of Energy Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV