Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPu Zhang
dc.contributor.authorHong Zhu
dc.contributor.authorGang Wu
dc.contributor.authorShao-Ping Meng
dc.contributor.authorZhi-Shen Wu
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-30T13:04:37Z
dc.date.available2017-12-30T13:04:37Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29CC.1943-5614.0000666.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4245352
dc.description.abstractThe mechanical performance of four types of interfaces between fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) plate and concrete was compared by double-lap-shear test. The study found that the failure characteristics of the four interfaces are obviously distinct. Among them, the shear capacity load of the shear key combined with wet-bond (SK-WB) interface was the highest, followed by the dry-bond and the coarse-aggregate-coating (CAC) interfaces; the wet-bond interface had the lowest shear load bearing capacity. The type of the resin used for the wet-bond adhesive has a slight influence on the bond strength, whereas the type of the resin used for the shear key bonding has a much more significant effect on the shear capacity load of these interfaces. The thickness of the wet-bond epoxy resin layer also has a significant impact on the bond performance of the wet-bond interface. The shear key forms has less influence when the flexural stiffness of the shear keys itself is sufficient; the load capacity of the SK-WB interface is often dependent on the bonding area between the shear key and the concrete. The concept of bond zone was put out when creating interface model of the SK-WB interface. Finally, unified form formulas of the shear capacity and the interface fracture energy are provided for the different interfaces, and the values of them are estimated.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleShear Capacity Comparison of Four Different Composite Interfaces between FRP Plates and Concrete Substrate
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume20
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Composites for Construction
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000666
dc.page04016006
dc.treeJournal of Composites for Construction:;2016:;Volume ( 020 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record