Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAtaur Rahman
dc.contributor.authorTamon Ueda
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-30T13:04:33Z
dc.date.available2017-12-30T13:04:33Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29CC.1943-5614.0000661.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4245346
dc.description.abstractThis experimental study was aimed to investigate the in-plane shear performance of externally strengthened masonry walls using two types of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) sheets, namely, carbon FRP (CFRP) and polyethylene terephthalate-FRP (PET-FRP) sheets. Among these two, PET-FRP has a low tensile strength but possess a higher fracturing strain than CFRP. Twelve masonry walls made from clay brick were tested for static lateral loading under constant compression, after bonding CFRP and PET-FRP sheets onto their surfaces in three different configurations. The ultimate shear strength and deformation at peak load were the two important observations. The mechanisms by which load was carried were observed, varying from the initial uncracked state to the final, fully cracked state. The results demonstrate that a significant increase in the in-plane shear capacity of masonry can be achieved by bonding these two FRPs to the surface of the walls but ductility is compromised when CFRP is used. Walls retrofitting with PET-FRP in a crossdiagonal fashion show a good ductile behavior in both prepeak and postpeak regimes. The experimental data were used to assess the effectiveness of the strengthening of one FRP over the other. PET-FRP in diagonal configuration was found to be the most effective way of strengthening without compromising the two most essential aspects of masonry, that is, strength and ductility.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleIn-Plane Shear Performance of Masonry Walls after Strengthening by Two Different FRPs
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume20
dc.journal.issue5
dc.journal.titleJournal of Composites for Construction
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000661
dc.page04016019
dc.treeJournal of Composites for Construction:;2016:;Volume ( 020 ):;issue: 005
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record