• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Optimal Hedging Rule for Reservoir Refill

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    %28ASCE%29WR.1943-5452.0000692.pdf (887.9Kb)
    Date
    2016
    Author
    Wenhua Wan
    Jianshi Zhao
    Jay R. Lund
    Tongtiegang Zhao
    Xiaohui Lei
    Hao Wang
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    In this study, an optimal reservoir refill hedging rule (RHR) is developed under hydrologic uncertainty using a two-stage model. Based on the probability distribution of the maximum refill water availability at the end of refill season, three possible cases exist: unfilled without flood damage, complete filling without flood damage, and complete filling with flood damage. These cases are characterized based on relationships among storage capacity, expected storage buffer, and maximum safe excess discharge. Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) conditions for the two-stage model show that the optimal refill operation equates the expected marginal loss of conservation benefit from not complete filling (i.e., ending storage of refill period less than storage capacity) and the expected marginal flood damage from levee overtopping downstream, unless constrained by capacity constraints. A RHR curve, which is analogous to water supply hedging and flood hedging rules, is drawn and shows the trade-off between the two objectives. The optimal refill hedging release decision shows a linear relationship with expected current water availability for a wide range of water conservation benefit functions (linear, concave, or convex). Several operational results are derived. A large downstream flood conveyance capacity and remaining storage capacity allow for a smaller current release and greater storage of water. Relative economic drivers are important; a greater economic potential for flood damage drives a greater release of water in the current stage, and vice versa. Below a critical forecast uncertainty value, improving forecasts reduces the volume of water released, although the opposite effect occurs above this critical value. Finally, the Danjiangkou Reservoir case shows that the RHR, combined with a rolling horizon decision approach, performs better than current rule curves and leads to a gradual dynamic refilling based on forecast information, indicating its potential for practical use.
    URI
    http://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4242226
    Collections
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV