Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEva O. L. Lantsoght
dc.contributor.authorCor van der Veen
dc.contributor.authorJoost C. Walraven
dc.contributor.authorAne de Boer
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-16T09:22:02Z
dc.date.available2017-12-16T09:22:02Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29BE.1943-5592.0000847.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4241904
dc.description.abstractA 55-year-old bridge showed large cracking in the approach bridge caused by restraint of deformation and support settlement. After repair, it was uncertain at which crack width the traffic loads on the bridge should be further restricted. The shear capacity was calculated by counting on the aggregate interlock capacity of a supposedly fully cracked cross section. An aggregate interlock relationship between shear capacity and crack width based on an unreinforced section was used to find the maximum allowable crack width. Limits for crack widths at which load restrictions should be imposed were found. The large structural capacity of the cracked concrete section shows that the residual bearing resistance based on the aggregate interlock capacity of reinforced concrete slab bridges with existing cracks is higher than expected. This expected capacity could be calculated with the inclined cracking load from the code provisions. The procedure outlined in this paper can thus be used for the shear assessment of fully cracked cross sections of reinforced concrete bridges.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleCase Study on Aggregate Interlock Capacity for the Shear Assessment of Cracked Reinforced-Concrete Bridge Cross Sections
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume21
dc.journal.issue5
dc.journal.titleJournal of Bridge Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000847
dc.treeJournal of Bridge Engineering:;2016:;Volume ( 021 ):;issue: 005
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record