• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Hidden-Model Processes for Adaptive Management under Uncertain Climate Change

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    %28ASCE%29IS.1943-555X.0000376.pdf (1.594Mb)
    Date
    2017
    Author
    Matteo Pozzi
    Milad Memarzadeh
    Kelly Klima
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Predictions of climate change can significantly affect the optimization of measures reducing the long-term risk for assets exposed to extreme events. Although a single climate model can be represented by a Markov stochastic process and directly integrated into the sequential decision-making procedure, optimization under epistemic uncertainty about the model is computationally more challenging. Decision makers have to define not only a set of models with corresponding probabilities, but also whether and how they will learn more about the likelihood of these models during the asset-management process. Different assumed learning rates about the climate can suggest opposite behaviors. For example, an agent believing, optimistically, that the correct model will soon be identified may prefer to wait for this information before making relevant decisions; on the other hand, an agent predicting, pessimistically, that no further information will ever be available may prefer to immediately take actions with long-term consequences. This paper proposes a set of optimization procedures based on the Markov decision process (MDP) framework to support decision making depending on the assumed learning rate, thus trading off the need for a prompt response with that for reducing uncertainty before deciding. Specifically, it outlines how approaches based on the MDP and hidden-mode MDPs, dynamic programming, and point-based value iteration can be used, depending on the assumptions on future learning. The paper describes the complexity of these procedures, discusses their performance in different settings, and applies them to flood risk mitigation.
    URI
    http://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4238446
    Collections
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV