Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHale, Lawrence
dc.contributor.authorPatil, Mayuresh
dc.contributor.authorRoy, Christopher J.
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-25T07:20:01Z
dc.date.available2017-11-25T07:20:01Z
dc.date.copyright2017/20/6
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn2377-2158
dc.identifier.othervvuq_002_02_021003.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4236170
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines various sensitivity analysis methods which can be used to determine the relative importance of input epistemic uncertainties on the uncertainty quantified performance estimate. The results from such analyses would then indicate which input uncertainties would merit additional study. The following existing sensitivity analysis methods are examined and described: local sensitivity analysis by finite difference, scatter plot analysis, variance-based analysis, and p-box-based analysis. As none of these methods are ideally suited for analysis of dynamic systems with epistemic uncertainty, an alternate method is proposed. This method uses aspects of both local sensitivity analysis and p-box-based analysis to provide improved computational speed while removing dependence on the assumed nominal model parameters.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleSensitivity of Input Epistemic Uncertainty on Nondeterministic Performance Estimates Using Nondeterministic Simulations
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume2
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4037004
dc.journal.fristpage21003
dc.journal.lastpage021003-7
dc.treeJournal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification:;2017:;volume( 002 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record