| dc.contributor.author | Gong, Jian-Guo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Xia, Qi-Wei | |
| dc.contributor.author | Xuan, Fu-Zhen | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-11-25T07:19:09Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-11-25T07:19:09Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2017/1/6 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0094-9930 | |
| dc.identifier.other | pvt_139_04_041412.pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4235628 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Based on a tee joint, the simplified creep design methods of ASME code, elastic-perfectly plastic (EPP) analysis of Code Case N-861 (CC N-861) and the inelastic analysis by isochronous stress strain (ISS) curve, were evaluated and compared to nonlinear finite element creep analysis (FECA). Results indicate that both EPP and FECA lead to a greater inelastic strain than ISS curve-based results. By contrast, the ISS-based analysis induces a smaller usage fraction (damage) than FECA due to the underestimated inelastic strain. In addition, the smallest usage fraction (damage) is obtained by using EPP analysis of CC N-861 in which case the remarkable bending strain is involved. | |
| dc.publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| dc.title | Evaluation of Simplified Creep Design Methods Based on the Case Analysis of Tee Joint at Elevated Temperature | |
| dc.type | Journal Paper | |
| dc.journal.volume | 139 | |
| dc.journal.issue | 4 | |
| dc.journal.title | Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1115/1.4036533 | |
| dc.journal.fristpage | 41412 | |
| dc.journal.lastpage | 041412-10 | |
| dc.tree | Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2017:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 004 | |
| dc.contenttype | Fulltext | |
