Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLai, Huan Sheng
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Kang Lin
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-25T07:19:07Z
dc.date.available2017-11-25T07:19:07Z
dc.date.copyright2017/26/5
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn0094-9930
dc.identifier.otherpvt_139_04_041101.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4235603
dc.description.abstractShells and tubes usually fail in the form of buckling under external pressure. Charts are used in the design of shells and tubes in the standards of ASME VIII-1 and EN13445-3 and these simplify the calculation process, while the proportional law is a more effective and simple method. In this paper, the relationships between the proportional law and the charts used in the standards were researched; finite element method (FEM) was used to compare the accuracies of the proportional law and the charts. It was theoretically proved that the proportional law and the charts were using essentially the same method to calculate the critical buckling pressure; they were different forms of the same dimensionless tension stress–strain curves. The simulation results showed that the proportional law and the charts had effectively equal accuracies in calculated critical buckling pressures. Therefore, the proportional law can be a candidate method included in the standards for the design of shells and tubes under external pressure.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleRelationships Between the Proportional Law and the Charts Used in ASME VIII-1 and EN13445-3 for Designing Shells and Tubes Under External Pressure
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume139
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4036531
dc.journal.fristpage41101
dc.journal.lastpage041101-6
dc.treeJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2017:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record