Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMa, Wenbin
dc.contributor.authorSchott, Dingena
dc.contributor.authorLodewijks, Gabriël
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-25T07:18:55Z
dc.date.available2017-11-25T07:18:55Z
dc.date.copyright2017/25/5
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn0892-7219
dc.identifier.otheromae_139_05_051704.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4235492
dc.description.abstractIn the literature, the continuous line bucket (CLB) lifting system and the pipe lifting system (PLS), as two typical mineral lifting methods in deep sea mining (DSM) systems, have been discussed since the 1960s. The purpose of this paper is to determine an appropriate lifting method for deep sea mining systems at different working conditions. The determination is based on the comparison of the analysis results of the two typical lifting methods considering the technology performance and the profitability. The analysis is based on a numerical calculation performed in a matlab environment. This paper shows the comparison of the results of the CLB system and PLS in terms of the lifting efficiency, the energy consumption, and the profitability. The research reported in this paper can be utilized to select a proper lifting method for a DSM project depending on its specific criteria analysis.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleContinuous Line Bucket Lifting Versus Pipe Lifting
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume139
dc.journal.issue5
dc.journal.titleJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4036375
dc.journal.fristpage51704
dc.journal.lastpage051704-9
dc.treeJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering:;2017:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 005
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record