Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLader, Pål
dc.contributor.authorFredriksson, David W.
dc.contributor.authorVolent, Zsolt
dc.contributor.authorDeCew, Jud
dc.contributor.authorRosten, Trond
dc.contributor.authorStrand, Ida M.
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-25T07:18:54Z
dc.date.available2017-11-25T07:18:54Z
dc.date.copyright2017/25/5
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn0892-7219
dc.identifier.otheromae_139_05_051301.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4235484
dc.description.abstractRecent environmental considerations, as salmon lice, escape of farmed fish and release of nutrients, have prompted the aquaculture industry to consider the use of closed fish production systems (CFPS). The use of such systems is considered as one potential way of expanding the salmon production in Norway. To better understand the response in waves of such bags, experiments were conducted with a series of 1:30 scaled models of closed flexible bags. The bags and floater were moored in a wave tank and subjected to series of regular waves (wave period between 0.5 and 1.5 s and wave steepness 1/15, 1/30, and 1/60). Three different geometries were investigated; cylindrical, spherical, and elliptical, and the models were both tested deflated (70% filling level) and inflated (100% filling level). Incident waves were measured together with the horizontal and vertical motion of the floater in two points (front and aft). Visual observations of the response were also done using cameras. The main finding from the experiments were that a deflated bag was more wave compliant than an inflated bag, and that the integrity (whether water entered or left the bag over the floater) was challenged for the inflated bags even for smaller waves (identified as wave condition B (1.0 m < H < 1.9 m) in Norwegian Standard NS 9415). A deflated bag is significantly more seaworthy than an inflated bag when it comes to integrity and motion of the floater.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleWave Response of Closed Flexible Bags
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume139
dc.journal.issue5
dc.journal.titleJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4036676
dc.journal.fristpage51301
dc.journal.lastpage051301-9
dc.treeJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering:;2017:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 005
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record