• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Assessment of MISR Cloud Motion Vectors (CMVs) Relative to GOES and MODIS Atmospheric Motion Vectors (AMVs)

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    ams-75364.pdf (3.214Mb)
    Date
    2016
    Author
    Mueller, Kevin J.
    Wu, Dong L.
    Horváth, Ákos
    Jovanovic, Veljko M.
    Muller, Jan-Peter
    Di Girolamo, Larry
    Garay, Michael J.
    Diner, David J.
    Moroney, Catherine M.
    Wanzong, Steve
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    loud motion vector (CMV) winds retrieved from the Multiangle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR) instrument on the polar-orbiting Terra satellite from 2003 to 2008 are compared with collocated atmospheric motion vectors (AMVs) retrieved from Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) imagery over the tropics and midlatitudes and from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) imagery near the poles. MISR imagery from multiple view angles is exploited to jointly retrieve stereoscopic cloud heights and motions, showing advantages over the AMV heights assigned by radiometric means, particularly at low heights (<3 km) that account for over 95% of MISR CMV sampling. MISR?GOES wind differences exhibit a standard deviation ranging with increasing height from 3.3 to 4.5 m s?1 for a high-quality [quality indicator (QI) ≥ 80] subset where height differences are <1.5 km. Much of the observed difference can be attributed to the less accurately retrieved component of CMV motion along the direction of satellite motion. MISR CMV retrieval is subject to correlation between error in retrieval of this along-track component and of height. This manifests as along-track bias varying with height to magnitudes as large as 2.5 m s?1. The cross-track component of MISR CMVs shows small (<0.5 m s?1) bias and standard deviation of differences (1.7 m s?1) relative to GOES AMVs. Larger differences relative to MODIS are attributed to the tracking of cloud features at heights lower than MODIS in multilayer cloud scenes.
    URI
    http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4217692
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV