Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMeir, Talmor
dc.contributor.authorPullen, Julie
dc.contributor.authorBlumberg, Alan F.
dc.contributor.authorHolt, Teddy R.
dc.contributor.authorBieringer, Paul E.
dc.contributor.authorBieberbach, George
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-09T16:51:14Z
dc.date.available2017-06-09T16:51:14Z
dc.date.copyright2017/01/01
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1558-8424
dc.identifier.otherams-75324.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4217648
dc.description.abstractesults are presented from a tracer-release modeling study designed to examine atmospheric transport and dispersion (?T&D?) behavior surrounding the complex coastal?urban region of New York City, New York, where air?sea interaction and urban influences are prominent. The puff-based Hazard Prediction Assessment Capability (HPAC, version 5) model is run for idealized conditions, and it is also linked with the urbanized COAMPS (1 km) meteorological model and the NAM (12 km) meteorological model. Results are compared with ?control? plumes utilizing surface meteorological input from 22 weather stations. In all configurations, nighttime conditions result in plume predictions that are more sensitive to small changes in wind direction. Plume overlap is reduced by up to 70% when plumes are transported during the night. An analysis of vertical plume cross sections and the nature of the underlying transport and the dispersion equations both suggest that heat flux gradients and boundary layer height gradients determine vertical transport of pollutants across land?sea boundaries in the T&D model. As a consequence, in both idealized and realistic meteorological configurations, waterfront releases generate greater plume discrepancies relative to plumes transported over land/urban surfaces. For transport over water (northwest winds), the higher-fidelity meteorological model (COAMPS) generated plumes with overlap reduced by about one-half when compared with that of the coarser-resolution NAM model (13% vs 24% during the daytime and 11% vs 18% during the nighttime). This study highlights the need for more sophisticated treatment of land?sea transition zones in T&D calculations covering waterside releases.
dc.publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
dc.titleSimulation of Airborne Transport and Dispersion for Urban Waterside Releases
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume56
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
dc.identifier.doi10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0025.1
dc.journal.fristpage27
dc.journal.lastpage44
dc.treeJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2016:;volume( 056 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record