Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGoly, Aneesh
dc.contributor.authorTeegavarapu, Ramesh S. V.
dc.contributor.authorMondal, Arpita
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-09T16:47:06Z
dc.date.available2017-06-09T16:47:06Z
dc.date.copyright2014/11/01
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.otherams-74028.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4216208
dc.description.abstracteveral statistical downscaling models have been developed in the past couple of decades to assess the hydrologic impacts of climate change by projecting the station-scale hydrological variables from large-scale atmospheric variables simulated by general circulation models (GCMs). This paper presents and compares different statistical downscaling models that use multiple linear regression (MLR), positive coefficient regression (PCR), stepwise regression (SR), and support vector machine (SVM) techniques for estimating monthly rainfall amounts in the state of Florida. Mean sea level pressure, air temperature, geopotential height, specific humidity, U wind, and V wind are used as the explanatory variables/predictors in the downscaling models. Data for these variables are obtained from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction?National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP?NCAR) reanalysis dataset and the Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis (CCCma) Coupled Global Climate Model, version 3 (CGCM3) GCM simulations. The principal component analysis (PCA) and fuzzy c-means clustering method (FCM) are used as part of downscaling model to reduce the dimensionality of the dataset and identify the clusters in the data, respectively. Evaluation of the performances of the models using different error and statistical measures indicates that the SVM-based model performed better than all the other models in reproducing most monthly rainfall statistics at 18 sites. Output from the third-generation CGCM3 GCM for the A1B scenario was used for future projections. For the projection period 2001?10, MLR was used to relate variables at the GCM and NCEP grid scales. Use of MLR in linking the predictor variables at the GCM and NCEP grid scales yielded better reproduction of monthly rainfall statistics at most of the stations (12 out of 18) compared to those by spatial interpolation technique used in earlier studies.
dc.publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
dc.titleDevelopment and Evaluation of Statistical Downscaling Models for Monthly Precipitation
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume18
dc.journal.issue18
dc.journal.titleEarth Interactions
dc.identifier.doi10.1175/EI-D-14-0024.1
dc.journal.fristpage1
dc.journal.lastpage28
dc.treeEarth Interactions:;2014:;volume( 018 ):;issue: 018
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record