• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    A 36-yr Climatological Description of the Evaporative Sources of Warm-Season Precipitation in the Mississippi River Basin

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    ams-65008.pdf (2.573Mb)
    Date
    2001
    Author
    Brubaker, Kaye L.
    Dirmeyer, Paul A.
    Sudradjat, Arief
    Levy, Benjamin S.
    Bernal, Fredric
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The terrestrial and oceanic sources of moisture that supply warm-season rainfall to the Mississippi River basin and its subbasins are examined over a 36-yr period (1963?98). Using hourly observed precipitation, National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) reanalyses at 6-h intervals, and a back-trajectory algorithm, the water falling during observed precipitation events is probabilistically traced to its most recent surface evaporative source, terrestrial or oceanic. Maps of these sources generally show dual maxima, one terrestrial and one oceanic, in spring and a dominance of terrestrial sources in summer. Pentad time series averaged over the 36 years show a late-summer maximum of precipitation recycling in all but the Missouri subbasin. During the 36 years analyzed, 32% of warm-season precipitation in the entire Mississippi basin originated as evaporation within the basin (recycled). About 20% of warm-season precipitation was contributed directly by evaporation from the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean. The Midwest flood year, 1993, represents a positive outlier in terms of July precipitation supplied to the Upper Mississippi directly by evaporation from the Caribbean. The monthly recycling ratios for warm-season precipitation during the drought year, 1988, represent extreme values in the time series but are not identified as outliers. A positive trend in precipitation recycling in the Upper Mississippi and Missouri subbasins and accompanying decrease in Gulf of Mexico/Caribbean?supplied precipitation to those regions are statistically significant but may reflect changes in the observational data stream assimilated by the NCEP model. Perturbation analysis demonstrates that the source fractions and recycling ratios are somewhat sensitive to systematic errors but not to random errors in the model-derived evapotranspiration (ET), arguably the largest source of uncertainty in the back-trajectory approach. Systematic errors in terrestrial ET on the order of 20% introduce errors of about 0.02 in land source fractions (including recycling ratios) that are themselves on the order of 0.10?0.30.
    URI
    http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4206186
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV