Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDavidson, G. A.
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-09T14:01:12Z
dc.date.available2017-06-09T14:01:12Z
dc.date.copyright1986/06/01
dc.date.issued1986
dc.identifier.issn0733-3021
dc.identifier.otherams-11014.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4146196
dc.description.abstractOf the numerous integral models that have been developed to describe buoyant plumes in stratified crossflows, Schatzmann's model appears to be the most mathematically rigorous and physically complete. So far, however, a comparative study of the performance of this model with previous simpler integral models has not been reported. To aid such a comparison, a control volume development of Schatzmann's governing equations is presented to parallel his more abstract differential development. Discrepancies between the equation act derived by Schatzmann and that derived from a control volume analysis are reported. The control volume equation act is found to be consistent with the equations published by previous workers, once Schatzmann's suggestion is taken into account that a mean flow convective interaction between the plume and its surroundings be included along with the usual turbulent entrainment interaction. The source of the discrepancies between equation sets is discussed, and a numerical example is presented to illustrate the effect of these differences in the governing equations on plume predictions.
dc.publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
dc.titleA Discussion of Schatzmann's Integral Plume Model from a Control Volume Viewpoint
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume25
dc.journal.issue6
dc.journal.titleJournal of Climate and Applied Meteorology
dc.identifier.doi10.1175/1520-0450(1986)025<0858:ADOSIP>2.0.CO;2
dc.journal.fristpage858
dc.journal.lastpage867
dc.treeJournal of Climate and Applied Meteorology:;1986:;Volume( 025 ):;Issue: 006
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record