Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYu, Shawn
dc.contributor.authorCase, Kenneth E.
dc.contributor.authorChernick, Julian
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-09T14:01:02Z
dc.date.available2017-06-09T14:01:02Z
dc.date.copyright1986/03/01
dc.date.issued1986
dc.identifier.issn0733-3021
dc.identifier.otherams-10973.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4146149
dc.description.abstractTo help in the implementation of Lund's probability of cloud-free line-of-sight (PCFLOS) calculations (method A and method B) for limited altitudes, a methodology for cumulative cloud cover calculation (required for both methods) is introduced and a methodology for cumulative cloud form determination (required for method B) is developed. To study the PCFLOS differences between the two methods, Lund's master matrices are investigated and the derived PCFLOS results of Hamburg, Germany, are compared and analyzed for variations in selected environmental parameters. Based upon numerical studies performed in this research effort, it is strongly recommended that Lund's method B should always be adopted for general purpose worldwide PCFLOS calculations.
dc.publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
dc.titleMethodologies and Comparisons for Lund's Two Methods for Calculating Probability of Cloud-Free Line-of-Sight
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume25
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Climate and Applied Meteorology
dc.identifier.doi10.1175/1520-0450(1986)025<0389:MACFLT>2.0.CO;2
dc.journal.fristpage389
dc.journal.lastpage397
dc.treeJournal of Climate and Applied Meteorology:;1986:;Volume( 025 ):;Issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record