Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHorel, J. D.
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-09T14:00:26Z
dc.date.available2017-06-09T14:00:26Z
dc.date.copyright1984/12/01
dc.date.issued1984
dc.identifier.issn0733-3021
dc.identifier.otherams-10797.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4145953
dc.description.abstractComplex principal component (CPC) analysis is shown to be a useful method for identifying traveling and standing waves in geophysical data sets. Combinations of simple progressive and standing oscillations are used to examine the properties of this technique. These examples illustrate that although CPC analysis allows for the identification of traveling waves, many of the drawbacks associated with conventional principal component analysis remain, and sometimes become worse; e.g. the interpretation of CPC solutions is more difficult since both amplitude and phase relationships must be considered. A method for linearly transforming complex principal components was devised in order to identify regional relationships within large geophysical data sets. The errors in CPC analysis resulting from limited sample sizes are discussed.
dc.publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
dc.titleComplex Principal Component Analysis: Theory and Examples
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume23
dc.journal.issue12
dc.journal.titleJournal of Climate and Applied Meteorology
dc.identifier.doi10.1175/1520-0450(1984)023<1660:CPCATA>2.0.CO;2
dc.journal.fristpage1660
dc.journal.lastpage1673
dc.treeJournal of Climate and Applied Meteorology:;1984:;volume( 023 ):;issue: 012
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record