Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJameson, A. R.
dc.contributor.authorHeymsfield, A. J.
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-09T14:00:12Z
dc.date.available2017-06-09T14:00:12Z
dc.date.copyright1984/05/01
dc.date.issued1984
dc.identifier.issn0733-3021
dc.identifier.otherams-10727.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4145876
dc.description.abstractIt appears that most hail signals less than zero measured by the National Center for Atmospheric Research CP-2 radar during the National Hail Research Experiment were produced by differences between the two beam patterns. Positive hail signals, however, were not significantly affected by these differences. It is concluded that the CP-2 radar did detect and delineate regions of large hail. Assuming Rayleigh scattering, Rinehart and Tuttle proposed that dual-wavelength data be reprocessed, to account for possible differences between the two beams. In the presence of hail, however, there will be sidelobe effects even if the two beam patterns are well measured and well matched. The use of the estimated erroneous hail signals as proposed by Rinehart and Tuttle, therefore, leads to substantial and ambiguous errors, and the technique should not be used.
dc.publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
dc.titleComments on “Antenna Beam Patterns and Dual-Wavelength Processing”
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume23
dc.journal.issue5
dc.journal.titleJournal of Climate and Applied Meteorology
dc.identifier.doi10.1175/1520-0450(1984)023<0855:COBPAD>2.0.CO;2
dc.journal.fristpage855
dc.journal.lastpage858
dc.treeJournal of Climate and Applied Meteorology:;1984:;volume( 023 ):;issue: 005
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record