Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCooper, William A.
dc.contributor.authorLawson, R. Paul
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-09T14:00:06Z
dc.date.available2017-06-09T14:00:06Z
dc.date.copyright1984/04/01
dc.date.issued1984
dc.identifier.issn0733-3021
dc.identifier.otherams-10693.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4145838
dc.description.abstractThe general characteristics of the clouds that were included in the HIPLEX-1 experiment are reviewed, and the results for the response variables are interpreted in light of other measurements from the instrumented aircraft. In most seeded clouds, the HIPLEX-1 experimental hypothesis corresponded with the observed precipitation development for only the first ?8 min after seeding. The failure to obtain a stronger statistical result is attributed to the inherent inefficiency of the small cumulus congestus selected as experimental units. This inefficiency was only partly due to low ice concentrations; a more significant cause of the low precipitation efficiency was the limited lifetime and low liquid water content of these clouds. Some calculations which indicate that these clouds could not support a rapid enough accretional growth process to lead to precipitation after seeding are discussed. Other reasons for the successes and failures of the experiment are discussed.
dc.publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
dc.titlePhysical Interpretation of Results from the HIPLEX-1 Experiment
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume23
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Climate and Applied Meteorology
dc.identifier.doi10.1175/1520-0450(1984)023<0523:PIORFT>2.0.CO;2
dc.journal.fristpage523
dc.journal.lastpage540
dc.treeJournal of Climate and Applied Meteorology:;1984:;volume( 023 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record