Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorW. E. Featherstone
dc.contributor.authorM. P. Stewart
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:01:34Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:01:34Z
dc.date.copyrightMay 2001
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.other%28asce%290733-9453%282001%29127%3A2%2831%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/35835
dc.description.abstractEllipsoidal and Australian Height Datum heights have been determined for a 60-point control network from five base stations by three separate users using three different makes of real-time kinematic (RTK) global positioning system (GPS) equipment. This was to determine whether these RTK GPS surveys (i.e. equipment and users combined) can meet vertical accuracy specifications for contract work with Main Roads Western Australia. A comparison of the differences between the RTK GPS ellipsoidal heights and the control indicates 51 mm (95% confidence) accuracy, accounting for errors in the control network. Likewise, the difference between the RTK GPS–derived Australian Height Datum heights and the control indicates 53 mm (95% confidence) accuracy. However, there was an increasing number of failed RTK GPS position solutions with increasing baseline length, which had to be omitted from these statistics.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleCombined Analysis of Real-Time Kinematic GPS Equipment and Its Users for Height Determination
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume127
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Surveying Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(2001)127:2(31)
dc.treeJournal of Surveying Engineering:;2001:;Volume ( 127 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record