Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJohn S. Horvath
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T20:33:04Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T20:33:04Z
dc.date.copyrightDecember 1983
dc.date.issued1983
dc.identifier.other%28asce%290733-9410%281983%29109%3A12%281591%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/19306
dc.description.abstractA review of the current state-of-the-art concerning the use of the modulus of subgrade reaction (Winkler) model indicates that there is considerable disagreement concerning the correct method for interpreting and evaluating the modulus of subgrade reaction, k. Extension of previous work, which used the simplified continuum approach to solve a problem in the theory of elasticity, shows that the Winkler subgrade model actually defines an elastic body of finite thickness in which all stress and strain components are assumed to be zero except for the vertical normal stress and strain. Furthermore, the modulus of subgrade reaction, k, is defined explicitly to be a function of the Young's modulus and thickness of the elastic body. Solutions for a Young's modulus that is constant with depth, as well as one that varies linearly and with the square root of depth, are presented. Although the simplified continuum approach offers an analytically rigorous and consistent method for evaluating the modulus of subgrade reaction, the more important result is that the very crude stress and strain assumptions implicit in the Winkler model are identified for the first time.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleModulus of Subgrade Reaction: New Perspective
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume109
dc.journal.issue12
dc.journal.titleJournal of Geotechnical Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1983)109:12(1591)
dc.treeJournal of Geotechnical Engineering:;1983:;Volume ( 109 ):;issue: 012
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record