Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIslam, Aminul
dc.contributor.authorGiannekas, Nikolaos
dc.contributor.authorMarhأ¶fer, David
dc.contributor.authorTosello, Guido
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Hans
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-09T01:32:06Z
dc.date.available2017-05-09T01:32:06Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn2166-0468
dc.identifier.otherjmnm_004_03_031003.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/162162
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this paper is to make a comparative study on the process capabilities of the two branches of the powder injection molding (PIM) process—metal injection molding (MIM) and ceramic injection molding (CIM), for highend precision applications. The stateoftheart literature does not make a clear comparative picture of the process capabilities of MIM and CIM. The current paper systematically characterizes the MIM and CIM processes and presents the process capabilities in terms of part shrinkage, surface replication, tolerance capability, and morphological fidelity. The results and discussion presented in the paper will be useful for thorough understanding of the MIM and CIM processes and to select the right material and process for the right application or even to combine metal and ceramic materials by molding to produce metal–ceramic hybrid components.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleExperimental Investigation of Comparative Process Capabilities of Metal and Ceramic Injection Molding for Precision Applications
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume4
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Micro and Nano
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4033820
dc.journal.fristpage31003
dc.journal.lastpage31003
dc.identifier.eissn1932-619X
dc.treeJournal of Micro and Nano-Manufacturing:;2016:;volume( 004 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record