Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCarpenter, H. W.
dc.contributor.authorReid, R. G.
dc.contributor.authorPaskaramoorthy, R.
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-09T01:29:06Z
dc.date.available2017-05-09T01:29:06Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn0094-4289
dc.identifier.othermats_138_03_031001.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/161256
dc.description.abstractA comparison is presented between the sensitivity to measurement error of the crack compliance and layer removal methods of residual stress measurement when applied to glass fiber reinforced plastic (GFRP) pipes. This is done by adding random scatter to the exact strain distribution associated with a known stress distribution. This defines strain data that simulate experimental measurements. These data are used to determine the corresponding residual stress distributions. The error in the residual stress distribution when scatter is included can thereby be determined. It is shown that the layer removal and crack compliance methods are equally suitable for the measurement of axial and circumferential stresses in a pipe wound at only آ±55 deg. The layer removal method, however, is shown to have significantly lower sensitivity to measurement error when the axial residual stresses in layered GFRP pipes are considered.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleSensitivity Analysis of the Crack Compliance and Layer Removal Methods for Residual Stress Measurement in GFRP Pipes
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume138
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4032559
dc.journal.fristpage31001
dc.journal.lastpage31001
dc.identifier.eissn1528-8889
dc.treeJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record