Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBraun, C. A.
dc.contributor.authorSchumaker, M.
dc.contributor.authorRice, J.
dc.contributor.authorBorg, J. P.
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-09T01:29:02Z
dc.date.available2017-05-09T01:29:02Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn0094-4289
dc.identifier.othermats_138_01_011003.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/161237
dc.description.abstractIn this work, the static and dynamic compaction response of a sixmaterial mixture, containing both brittle and ductile constituents, is compared. Quasistatic and dynamic compaction experiments were conducted on samples and the results compared to simulations. Optical analyses of compacted samples indicate that dynamically compacting samples to near 300 m/s is not sufficient for complete compaction or localized grain melt. Simulations indicate that a wide distribution of temperature and stress states are achieved in the dynamically compacted samples; compaction speeds should be increased to near 800 m/s at which point copper grains achieve melt temperatures on their surfaces. The experimental data is used to fit a bulk Pخ± equation of state (EOS) that can be used for simulating largescale dynamic compaction for industrial applications.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleComparison of Static and Dynamic Powder Compaction: Experiment and Simulation
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume138
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4031615
dc.journal.fristpage11003
dc.journal.lastpage11003
dc.identifier.eissn1528-8889
dc.treeJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record