• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Frequency Versus Time Domain Fatigue Analysis of a Semisubmersible Wind Turbine Tower

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    omae_137_01_011901.pdf (988.4Kb)
    Date
    2015
    Author
    Kvittem, Marit I.
    Moan, Torgeir
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The current paper deals with a study of a semisubmersible wind turbine (WT), where shortterm tower base bending moments and tower fatigue damage were estimated by a frequency domain (FD) method. Both a rigid structure assumption and a generalized degreeoffreedom (DOF) model for including the first flexible mode of the turbine tower were investigated. First, response to wind and wave loads was considered separately, then superposition was used to find the response to combined wind and wave loading. The bending moments and fatigue damage obtained by these methods were compared to results from a fully coupled, nonlinear time domain (TD) analysis. In this study a three column, catenary moored semisubmersible with the NREL 5 MW turbine mounted on one of the columns was modeled. The model was inspired by the WindFloat concept. The TD simulation tool used was SimoRiflexAeroDyn from Marintek and CeSOS. The FD method gave a good representation of the tower base bending moment histories for waveonly analyses, for the moderate sea states considered in these analyses. With the assumption that the structure is completely rigid, bending moments were underestimated, but including excitation of the elastic tower and blades, improved the results. The windinduced lowfrequency bending moments were not captured very well, which presumably comes from a combination of nonlinear effects being lost in the linearization of the thrust force and that the aerodynamic damping model was derived for a fixed turbine. Nevertheless, standard deviations of the bending moments were still reasonable. The FD model captured the combined wind and wave analyses quite well when a generalized coordinates model for wind excitation of the first bending mode of the turbine was included. The FD fatigue damage predictions were underestimated by 0–60%, corresponding to discrepancies in standard deviations of stress in the order of 0–20%.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/159337
    Collections
    • Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV