Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorXiao, Feng
dc.contributor.authorChen, Yong
dc.contributor.authorHua, Hongxing
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-09T01:11:39Z
dc.date.available2017-05-09T01:11:39Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn0892-7219
dc.identifier.otheromae_136_02_021402.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/156048
dc.description.abstractFinite element simulations of rubber protective coatings with different structures under two dynamic loading cases were performed. They were monolithic coating and honeycomb structures with three different cell topologies (hexachiral honeycomb, reentrant honeycomb, and circular honeycomb). The two loading cases were a dynamic compression load and water blast shock wave. The dynamic mechanical responses of those coatings under these two loading cases were compared. Finite element simulations have been undertaken using the ABAQUS/Explicit software package to provide insights into the coating's working mechanism and the relation between compression behavior and water blast shock resistance. The rubber materials were modeled as hyperelastic materials. The reaction force was selected as the major comparative criterion. It is concluded that when under dynamic compressive load, the cell topology played an important role at high speed, and when under underwater explosion, the honeycomb coatings can improve the shock resistance significantly at the initial stage. For honeycomb coatings with a given relative density, although structural absorbed energy has a significant contribution in the shock resistance, soft coating can significantly reduce the total incident impulse at the initial fluidstructure interaction stage. Further, a smaller fraction of incident impulse is imparted to the honeycomb coating with lower compressive strength.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleComparative Study of the Shock Resistance of Rubber Protective Coatings Subjected to Underwater Explosion
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume136
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4026670
dc.journal.fristpage21402
dc.journal.lastpage21402
dc.identifier.eissn1528-896X
dc.treeJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record