Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKang, Sungbum
dc.contributor.authorCharles Ume, I.
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-09T01:06:50Z
dc.date.available2017-05-09T01:06:50Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn1528-9044
dc.identifier.otherep_136_03_031007.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/154479
dc.description.abstractElectronic packaged devices are becoming increasingly smaller in size and higher in density while requiring higher performance and superior reliability. Warpage is one of the crucial factors for the thermomechanical reliability of electronic packages and warpage control becomes a more crucial process during the printed wiring board (PWB) fabrication and package assembly processes. This requirement necessitates more accurate methods of measuring warpage. The fringe projection methods are recent trends for measuring the warpage of chip packages, PWBs, and PWB assemblies (PWBAs) because of their noncontact, fullfield, and highresolution measurement capabilities. This paper presents a comparison of two fringe projection methods: laser fringe projection (LFP) (projection moirأ©) and digital fringe projection (DFP). Experimental results show that digital fringe projection has higher practical resolution, and better accuracy and precision than laser fringe projection.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleComparison of Warpage Measurement Capabilities and Results Obtained by Using Laser and Digital Fringe Projection Methods
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume136
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Electronic Packaging
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4027425
dc.journal.fristpage31007
dc.journal.lastpage31007
dc.identifier.eissn1043-7398
dc.treeJournal of Electronic Packaging:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record