Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMao, Wengang
dc.contributor.authorRychlik, Igor
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-09T01:02:04Z
dc.date.available2017-05-09T01:02:04Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn0892-7219
dc.identifier.otheromae_135_2_024501.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/152970
dc.description.abstractIn this note the relation between two simple approaches to estimate the extreme ship response used when no, or a limited, amount of data are available is discussed. The first one employs the long term distribution of the local maxima of ship response while the second one uses the expected number of upcrossings of a level by the response. It is mathematically demonstrated that the two approaches are equivalent. However, the upcrossing method is more straightforward and convenient for practical applications, particularly for nonGaussian responses. The fullscale measurements of a 2800 TEU container ship during the first six months of 2008 are used in the comparisons.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleNotes on the Prediction of Extreme Ship Response
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume135
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4023202
dc.journal.fristpage24501
dc.journal.lastpage24501
dc.identifier.eissn1528-896X
dc.treeJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering:;2013:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record