Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned2017-05-09T01:00:56Z
dc.date.available2017-05-09T01:00:56Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1050-0472
dc.identifier.othermd_135_08_080301.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/152527
dc.description.abstractIn the mid 1980s, I was one of an eclectic group of academics who began looking at design as a formal area of research. Some approached it as an effort to understand and codify the process of design, others focused on the theory of design, while yet others were interested in grammars, graphics, and philosophy. At the time, “designâ€‌ was on the back burner at most universities with mechanical engineering classes focused on the analysis of machine components such as nuts, bolts, gears, bearings, and engines. There was very little research on “designâ€‌ itself. Rather, those interested in the topic focused their research on components, materials, or formal methods like optimization or kinematics.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.title25 Years of Design Theory and Methodology
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume135
dc.journal.issue8
dc.journal.titleJournal of Mechanical Design
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4024846
dc.journal.fristpage80301
dc.journal.lastpage80301
dc.identifier.eissn1528-9001
dc.treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2013:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 008
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record