Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZhou, L. G.
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Hanchen
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-09T00:58:46Z
dc.date.available2017-05-09T00:58:46Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn0094-4289
dc.identifier.othermats_135_1_011010.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/151779
dc.description.abstractA controversy exists among literature reports of constraints on elastic constants. In particular, it has been reported that embedded atom method (EAM) potentials generally impose three constraints on elastic constants of crystals that are inconsistent with experiments. However, it can be shown that some EAM potentials do not impose such constraints at all. This paper first resolves this controversy by identifying the necessary condition when the constraints exist and demonstrating the condition is physically necessary. Furthermore, this paper reports that these three constraints are eliminated under all conditions, by using response EAM (REAM) potentials.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleControversy Over Elastic Constants Based on Interatomic Potentials
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume135
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4023189
dc.journal.fristpage11010
dc.journal.lastpage11010
dc.identifier.eissn1528-8889
dc.treeJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology:;2013:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record