• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Electronic Packaging
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Electronic Packaging
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Geometric Optimization of C Shaped Cavities According to Bejan's Theory: General Review and Comparative Study

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    ep_135_03_031007.pdf (1.189Mb)
    Date
    2013
    Author
    Lorenzini, G.
    Biserni, C.
    Rocha, L. A. O.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The aim of this paper is to consider, by means of the numerical investigation, the geometric optimization of a cavity that intrudes into a solid with internal heat generation. The objective is to minimize the maximal dimensionless excess of temperature between the solid and the cavity. The cavity is rectangular, with fixed volume and variable aspect ratio. The cavity shape is optimized for two sets of boundary conditions: isothermal cavity and cavity cooled by convection heat transfer. The optimal cavity is the one that penetrates almost completely the conducting wall and proved to be practically independent of the boundary thermal conditions, for the external ratio of the solid wall smaller than 2. As for the convective cavity, it is worthy to know that for values of H/L greater than 2, the best shape is no longer the one that penetrates completely into the solid wall, but the one that presents the largest cavity aspect ratio H0/L0. Finally, when compared with the optimal cavity ratio calculated for the isothermal Cshaped square cavity, the cavities cooled by convection highlight almost the same optimal shape for values of the dimensionless group خ»â€‰â‰¤â€‰0.01. Both cavities, isothermal and cooled by convection, also present similar optimal shapes for د•0 < 0.3 and د•0 > 0.7. However, in the range 0.3 ≤ د•0 ≤ 0.7, the ratio (H0/L0)opt calculated for the cavities cooled by convection is greater than the one presented by isothermal cavities. This difference is approximately 17% when خ»â€‰= 0.1 and د•0 = 0.7, and 20% for خ»â€‰= 1 and د•0 = 0.5.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/151438
    Collections
    • Journal of Electronic Packaging

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV