Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDerek W. Fultz
dc.contributor.authorPo-Ya Abel Chuang
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-09T00:44:37Z
dc.date.available2017-05-09T00:44:37Z
dc.date.copyrightAugust, 2011
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn2381-6872
dc.identifier.otherJFCSAU-28949#041010_1.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/146465
dc.description.abstractTwo fuel cell architectures, differing only by the surfaces onto which the electrodes were applied, have been analyzed to determine the root causes of dissimilarities in performance. The basic proton exchange membrane fuel cell is comprised of the proton transporting membrane, platinum-containing anode and cathode electrodes, porous carbon fiber gas diffusion media (GDM), and flow fields that deliver the reactant hydrogen and air flows. As no optimal cell design currently exists, there is a degree of latitude regarding component assembly and structure. Catalyst coated diffusion media (CCDM) refers to a cell architecture option where the electrode layers are coated on the GDM layers and then hot pressed to the membrane. Catalyst coated membrane (CCM) refers to an architecture where the electrodes are transferred directly onto the membrane. A cell with CCDM architecture has tightly bonded interfaces throughout the assembly, which can result in lower thermal and electrical contact resistances. Considering the fuel cell as a 1D thermal system, the through-plane thermal resistance was observed to decrease by 5–10% when comparing CCDM to CCM architectures. This suggests that the thermal contact resistance at the electrode interfaces was significantly reduced in the hot-press process. In addition, the electrical contact resistances between the electrode and GDM were observed to be significantly reduced with a CCDM architecture. This study shows that these effects, which have a potential to increase performance, can be attributed to the hot-press lamination process and use of CCDM architecture.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleThe Property and Performance Differences Between Catalyst Coated Membrane and Catalyst Coated Diffusion Media
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume8
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4003632
dc.journal.fristpage41010
dc.identifier.eissn2381-6910
dc.keywordsTemperature
dc.keywordsDiffusion (Physics)
dc.keywordsElectrical resistance
dc.keywordsElectrodes
dc.keywordsFuel cells
dc.keywordsArchitecture
dc.keywordsCatalysts
dc.keywordsMembranes
dc.keywordsPresses
dc.keywordsThermal resistance
dc.keywordsManufacturing
dc.keywordsPressure
dc.keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
dc.keywordsAnodes
dc.keywordsChannels (Hydraulic engineering)
dc.keywordsPlatinum AND Contact resistance
dc.treeJournal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology:;2011:;volume( 008 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record