Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlbert Gyr
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-09T00:36:05Z
dc.date.available2017-05-09T00:36:05Z
dc.date.copyrightMarch, 2010
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.issn0003-6900
dc.identifier.otherAMREAD-25925#020801_1.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/142335
dc.description.abstractMeanders are puzzling phenomena because a meandering river seems to contradict the principle of least action. Different approaches to explain this paradox are outlined by adopting a topological view, which allows for a classification of different types of meanders and to discuss the relevant mechanisms in a rather general manner. It is shown that secondary flows of helical type are the features responsible for the increase in the sediment transport when the slope of rivers decreases due to meandering and that the increase in the discharge is due to a partial Beltramisation of the flow and to a reduction in the friction at the boundary of the helical cells. The review article contains 78 references.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleThe Meander Paradox—A Topological View
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume63
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleApplied Mechanics Reviews
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4000725
dc.journal.fristpage20801
dc.identifier.eissn0003-6900
dc.treeApplied Mechanics Reviews:;2010:;volume( 063 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record