Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJian-Zhong Zhao
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-09T00:36:04Z
dc.date.available2017-05-09T00:36:04Z
dc.date.copyrightNovember, 2010
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.issn0003-6900
dc.identifier.otherAMREAD-25938#060803_1.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/142323
dc.description.abstractToupin’s Theorem plays the most influential role in the history of development concerning Saint-Venant’s Principle. We now review the history and the previous works, distinguishing Saint-Venant type decay from Toupin-type decay and arguing that Toupin’s Theorem is not a formulation of Saint-Venant’s Principle; Saint-Venant’s Principle stated by Love can be disproved mathematically from Toupin’s Theorem, so Toupin’s Theorem is mathematically inconsistent with Saint-Venant’s Principle; Modified Saint-Venant’s Principle can be proved or formulated, though Saint-Venant’s Principle in its general form stated by Boussinesq and Love is not true.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleToupin-Type Decay and Saint-Venant’s Principle
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume63
dc.journal.issue6
dc.journal.titleApplied Mechanics Reviews
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4004008
dc.journal.fristpage60803
dc.identifier.eissn0003-6900
dc.keywordsTheorems (Mathematics)
dc.keywordsDensity
dc.keywordsStress
dc.keywordsCylinders
dc.keywordsSaint-Venant's principle
dc.keywordsBoundary-value problems AND Equations
dc.treeApplied Mechanics Reviews:;2010:;volume( 063 ):;issue: 006
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record