Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLao Xingsheng
dc.contributor.authorZhuge Weilin
dc.contributor.authorZhang Yangjun
dc.contributor.authorMa Shihu
dc.contributor.authorZhao Juntao
dc.contributor.authorZeng Hong
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-09T00:33:31Z
dc.date.available2017-05-09T00:33:31Z
dc.date.copyrightFebruary, 2009
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.issn2381-6872
dc.identifier.otherJFCSAU-28936#014501_1.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/140908
dc.description.abstractThe performance of membrane humidifier (MH) and enthalpy wheel humidifier (EWH) for a large power proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) system is compared using simulations and experiments. The MH model is based on one dimensional diffusion equation and the EWH model is based on the porous media surface diffusion equation. Simulation results agree well with experimental data. According to the results, the effect of intake air temperature has a lower effect on the MH performance than it does on the EWH performance while the air mass flow has a much higher effect on the MH performance than it does on the EWH performance. MH performs better than EWH at a low flow rate but worse at a high flow rate. Vapor transfer mechanism in the humidifiers is also studied.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleComparative Study of Membrane Humidifier and Enthalpy Wheel Humidifier for Large Power Fuel Cell System
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume6
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.2971175
dc.journal.fristpage14501
dc.identifier.eissn2381-6910
dc.keywordsHumidifiers
dc.keywordsEnthalpy
dc.keywordsMembranes
dc.keywordsWheels
dc.keywordsFlow (Dynamics) AND Temperature
dc.treeJournal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology:;2009:;volume( 006 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record