• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Phase Stability and Sintering Behavior of 10mol%Sc2O3–1mol%CeO2–ZrO2 Ceramics

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    JFCSAU-28937#021007_1.pdf (1.189Mb)
    Date
    2009
    Author
    Nicholas Bernier
    Sergey Yarmolenko
    Jag Sankar
    Michael Klimov
    Jay Kapat
    Nina Orlovskaya
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The phase composition and sintering behavior of two commercially available 10mol%Sc2O3–1mol%CeO2–ZrO2 ceramics produced by Daiichi Kigenso Kagaku Kogyo (DKKK) and Praxair have been studied. DKKK powders have been manufactured using a wet coprecipitation chemical route, and Praxair powders have been produced by spray pyrolysis. The morphology of the powders, as studied by scanning electron microscopy, has been very different. DKKK powders were presented as soft (∼100μm) spherical agglomerates containing 60–100nm crystalline particles, whereas the Praxair powders were presented as sintered platelet agglomerates, up to 30μm long and 3–4μm thick, which consisted of smaller 100–200nm crystalline particles. X-ray diffraction analysis has shown that both DKKK and Praxair powders contained a mixture of cubic (c) and rhombohedral (r) phases: 79% cubic +21% rhombohedral for DKKK powders and 88% cubic +12% rhombohedral for Praxair powders. Higher quantities of the Si impurity level have been detected in Praxair powder as compared to DKKK powder by secondary ion mass spectroscopy. The morphological features, along with differences in composition and the impurity level of both powders, resulted in significantly different sintering behaviors. The DKKK powders showed a more active sintering behavior than of Praxair powders, reaching 93–95% of theoretical density when sintered at 1300°C for 2h. Comparatively, the Praxair powders required high sintering temperatures at 1500–1600°C. However, even at such high sintering temperatures, a significant amount of porosity was observed. Both DKKK and Praxair ceramics sintered at 1300°C or above exist in a cubic phase at room temperature. However, if sintered at 1100°C and 1200°C, the DKKK ceramics exist in a rhombohedral phase at room temperature. The DKKK ceramics sintered at 1300°C or above exhibit cubic to rhombohedral and back to cubic phase transitions upon heating at a 300–500°C temperature range, while Praxair ceramics exist in a pure cubic phase upon heating from room temperature to 900°C. However, if heated rather fast, the cubic to rhombohedral phase transformation could be avoided. Thus it is not expected that the observed phase transitions play a significant role in developing transformation stresses in ScCeZrO2 electrolyte upon heating and cooling down from the operation temperatures.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/140860
    Collections
    • Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV